Does product involvement influence how emotions drive satisfaction?An approach through the Theory of Hedonic Asymmetry

  1. Cristina Calvo-Porral 1
  2. Agustín Ruiz-Vega 2
  3. Jean-Pierre Lévy-Mangin 3
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

  3. 3 University of Quebec
    info

    University of Quebec

    Quebec, Canadá

    ROR https://ror.org/010gxg263

Revista:
European Research on Management and Business Economics

ISSN: 2444-8834

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 24

Número: 3

Páginas: 130-136

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IEDEEN.2018.06.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: European Research on Management and Business Economics

Resumen

This study examines whether the level of product involvement influences how emotions drive consumer satisfaction. Based on the Theory of the Hedonic Asymmetry we analyze through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) how emotions drive consumer satisfaction. A sample of 570 respondents was gathered for a high involvement product – wine –, while a sample of 431 consumers was collected for a low involvement product – a cup of coffee –. Results show that positive emotions exert a higher influence on satisfaction in low involvement products, rather than in high involvement products, suggesting that situational factors – such as the occasion of consumption – could be acting as qualifiers of pleasant emotions. Additionally, our findings support the moderating role of product involvement on the consumption-elicited emotions and satisfaction link.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulleting,103(3),411–423.
  • Avnet, T., Laufer, D., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Are all experiences of fit created equal?: Two paths to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 301–316.
  • Barrett, L. F., Mesquida, B., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373–403.
  • Barsky, J. D., & Nash, L. (2002). Evoking emotion: Affective keys to hotel loyalty. Cornel Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 39–46.
  • Baumgartner, H., Sujan, M., & Bettman, J. R. (1992). Autobiographical memories, affect and consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(1), 53–82.
  • Beatty, S. E., Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. (1988). The involvement-commitment model: Theory and implications. Journal of Business Research,16(2), 149–167.
  • Bell, R., & Marshall, D. W. (2003). The construct of food involvement in behavioral research: Scale development and validation. Appetite, 40, 235–244.
  • Birch, L. L., Billman, J., & Richard, S. S. (1984). Time of day influences food acceptability. Appetite,5, 109–116.
  • Bloch, P. H. (1982). Involvement beyond the purchase process: Conceptual issuesand empirical investigation. In A. Mitchell (Ed.), Advances in consumer research. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.
  • Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983). A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions.Journal of Marketing, 47, 69–81.
  • Bloemer,J.,&DeRuyter,K.(1999).Customer loyalty in high and low involvement service settings: The moderating impact of positive emotions. Journal of Marketing Management,15(4), 315–330.
  • Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research,17(2), 375–384.
  • Clore, G. L. (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Desmet, P., & Schifferstein, J. N. J. (2008). Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite,50, 290–301.
  • Diener, E. (1999). Introduction to the special section of the structure of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 803–804.
  • Dube, L., & Menon, K. (2000). Multiple roles of consumption emotions in post-purchase satisfaction with extended service transactions. International Journalof Service Industry Management, 11, 287–304.
  • Dube, L., Cervellon, M. C., & Han, J. (2003). Should consumer attitudes be reduced totheir affective and cognitive bases?: Validation of a hierarchical model. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 259–272.
  • Dunning, J., O’Cass, A., & Pecotich, A. (2004). Retail sales explanations: Resolving unsatisfactory sales encounters. European Journal of Marketing, 38(11/12),1541–1561.
  • Ferrarini, R., Casarotti, E. M., Nicolis, E., Nencini, A., Carbognin, C., & Menghini, A. M.(2010). The emotional response to wine consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 720–725.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with un observable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),30–50
  • Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Halstead, D., Hartman, D., & Schmidt, S. L. (1994). Multisource effects on the satisfaction formation process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2),114–129.
  • Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (1998).Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969).The theory of buyer behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Jain, S. K., & Sharma, K. (2000). Product related antecedents of consumer involvement: An empirical investigation.The Journal for Decision Makers,25(1), 29–42
  • Johnson, M.D., & Fornell, C.(1991). A frame work for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and product categories. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12,267–286.
  • King, S., & Meiselman, H. L. (2010). Development of a method to measure consumer emotions associated with foods. Food Quality and Preference, 21,168–177.
  • Laaksonen, P. (1994).Consumer involvement: Concepts and research. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Laros, F. J., & Steenkamp, J. B. (2005). Emotions in consumer behaviour: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1437–1445.
  • Lesschaeve, I., & Bruwer, J. (2010). The importance of involvement and implications for new product development. In S. R. Jaeger, & H. MacFie (Eds.), Consumer-driven innovation in food and personal care products. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
  • Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carry over effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science,15(5), 337–341.
  • Mano, H. ,& Oliver, R.L. (1993).Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 451–465.
  • Marshall, D., & Bell, R. (2004). Relating the food involvement scale to demographic variables, food choice and other constructs. Food Quality and Preference,15,871–879.
  • Macht, M. (2008). How emotions affect eating: A five-way model. Appetite,50, 1–11.
  • Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). Approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Mittal, B. L. (1989). Measuring purchase decision involvement. Psychology and Marketing,6, 147–162.
  • Nunally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Ogbeide, O. A., & Bruwer, J. (2013). Enduring involvement with wine: Predictive model and measurement. Journal of Wine Research, 24(3), 210–226.
  • Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioural perspective on the consumer. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.
  • Phillips, D. M., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). The role of consumption emotions in the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12,243–252.
  • Quester, P. G., & Smart, J. (1998). The influence of consumption situation and product involvement over consumers’ use of product attribute.The Journal of Consumer Marketing,15(3), 220–238.
  • Richins, M. L., McKeage, K. K., & Najjar, D. (1992). An exploration of materialism and consumption-related affect.Advances in Consumer Research,19, 229–236.
  • Richins, M. L. (1997). Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 127–147.
  • Richins, M. L., & Bloch, P. H. (1988). The role of situational and enduring involvement in post-purchase product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 1, 10–15.
  • Russell, J. A., & Mehrabian, A. (1977). Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of Research in Personality,11, 273–294.
  • Scherer, K. R. (1982). Emotion as a process: Function, origin and regulation. Social Science Information, 21, 555–570.
  • Schifferstein, H. N., & Desmet, P. M. (2010). Hedonic asymmetry in emotional responses to consumer products. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 1100–1104.
  • Tsiros, M., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. (2004). The role of attributions in customer satisfaction: A reexamination. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 476–483.
  • Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product-consumption-based affective responses and post-purchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research ,24(4), 258–270.
  • Westbrook, R. A., & Oliver, R. L. (1991). The dimensionality of consumption emotion patterns and consumer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 84–91.
  • Wood, S., & Moreau, C. (2006). From fear to loathing?: How emotions influence the evaluation and early use of innovation. Journal of Marketing, 70, 44–57.
  • Zaichkowsky, J. (1985). Measuring involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research,12(2), 341–352.
  • Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986). Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of Advertising,15(2),4–14.