Productive vocabulary knowledge of spanish efl learners

  1. Andrés Canga Alonso 1
  2. Mario Arribas García 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    GRID grid.119021.a

Journal:
RAEL: revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 1885-9089

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 13

Issue: 1

Pages: 39-56

Type: Article

Export: RIS

Metrics

Cited by

  • Dialnet Métricas Cited by: 2 (17-09-2021)

CIRC

  • Human Sciences: C

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating (i) the productive vocabulary knowledge of 38 10th grade (4th ESO) EFL Spanish students in two secondary schools located in the north of Spain, (ii) analysing the results obtained according to sex-based differences among the participants and (iii) its pedagogical implications for students’ understanding of written and spoken discourse in English. We used the parallel version (version A+ version C) of the Productive Vocabulary Levels Test (PVLT) (Laufer and Nation 1995, 1999) as the instrument to measure students’ productive vocabulary knowledge. Our results reveal that our students’ productive vocabulary size is below 1,000 words. As for sex-based differences, girls’ mean scores are higher than boys’ but the differences between both sexes are not statistically significant. These findings also indicate that most of the students in the present study could have problems to understand written and spoken discourse in English due to their low scores in the PVLT.

Bibliographic References

  • Agustín Llach, M. P. and M. Terrazas Gallego. 2012. Vocabulary knowledge development and gender differences in a second language. ELIA 12: 45-75. [Available at http://institucional.us.es/revistas/elia/12/art_3.pdf]
  • Adolphs, S. and N. Schmitt. 2004. Vocabulary coverage according to spoken discourse context. In P. Bogaard and B. Laufer, (eds.), Vocabulary in a Second Language. 39-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Boyle, J. P. 1987. Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning 37/2: 273-284.
  • Canga Alonso, A. 2013a. Receptive vocabulary size of Spanish EFL learners at secondary school. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 8: 66-75. [Available at doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1180]
  • Canga Alonso, A. 2013b. The receptive vocabulary of Spanish students in CLIL and nonCLIL instruction. Op. cit: Series II, 2. [Available at https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxhcGVhYWRpcmVjYW98Z3g6MWZmMGEwODAwMmMyMGRiYg]
  • Canga Alonso, A. 2013c. The receptive vocabulary of Spanish 6th grade primary school students in CLIL instruction: A preliminary study. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning (LACLIL) 6/2: 22-41. [Available at doi: 10.5294/laclil.2013.6.2.2]
  • Cobb, T. and Horst, M. 2004. Vocabulary sizes of some City University students. City University (HK) Journal of Language Studies 1: 59-68.
  • Edelenbos, P. and M. Vinjé. 2000. The assessment of a foreign language at the end of primary (elementary) education, Language Testing 17/2: 144-162.
  • Fitzpatrick, T. and P. Meara. 2004. Exploring the validity of a test of productive vocabulary. VIAL 1: 55-73. [Available at http://webs.uvigo.es/vialjournal/pdf/Vial-2004-Article3.pdf]
  • Hazenberg, S. and J. Hulstijn. 1996. Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics 17: 145-163.
  • Hirsh, D. and P. Nation. 1992. What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language 8: 689-696.
  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M., ed., 2010: Gender Perspectives on Vocabulary in Foreign and Second Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and S. Moreno Espinosa. 2004. L2 word associations and the variable sex: An outline according to an electronic tool. In A. R. Celada, D. Pastor García and P. J. Pardo García, (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International AEDEAN
  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and S. Moreno Espinosa. 2005. Using Lex30 to measure the L2 productive vocabulary of Spanish primary learners of EFL. VIAL 2: 27-44. [Available at http://webs.uvigo.es/vialjournal/pdf/Vial-2005-Article2.pdf]
  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and J. Ojeda Alba. 2009. Girls’ and boys’ lexical availability in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 158: 57-76.
  • Jiménez, R. M. and M. Terrazas Gallego. 2005-2008. The receptive vocabulary of English foreign language young learners. Journal of English Studies 5: 173-191.
  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe. 2009. The receptive vocabulary of EFL learners in two instructional contexts: CLIL versus non-CLIL. In R. M. Jiménez
  • Catalán and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, (eds.), Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe. 81-92. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Laufer, B. 1992. How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In J. Pierre, L. Arnaud and H. Béjoint (eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics. 126-132. London: Macmillan.
  • Laufer, B. 1997. The lexical plight in second language reading. In J. Coady and T. Huckin (eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. 20-34.Cambridge: Cambridge
  • Laufer, B. 1998. The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different? Applied Linguistics 19/2: 255-271.
  • Laufer, B. and P. S. N. Nation. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16: 307-322.
  • Laufer, B. and P. S. N. Nation. 1999. ‘A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive vocabulary. Language Testing 16/1: 33-51.
  • Laufer, B. 1997: The lexical plight in second language reading. In J. Coady and T. Huckin, (eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. 20-34. Cambridge: Cambridge
  • Lin, J. and F. Wu. 2003. Differential performance by gender in foreign language testing, Poster for the 2003 annual meeting of NCME Chicago.
  • López-Mezquita Molina, M. T. 2005. La Evaluación de la Competencia Léxica: Tests de Vocabulario. Su Fiabilidad y Validez. PhD dissertation. Universidad de Granada.
  • Lynn, R., Fergusson, D. and L. J. Horwood. 2005. Sex differences on the WISC-R in New Zealand. Personality and Individual Differences 39: 103-114.
  • Martínez Adrián, M and F. Gallardo del Puerto. 2010. L2 receptive and productive vocabulary in senior learners. ITL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 160, 112-131.
  • Meara, P., and T. Fitzpatrick. 2000. Lex 30: An improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. System 28: 19-30.
  • Milton, J. 2009. Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Milton, J. and Meara, P. 1998. Are the British really bad at learning foreign languages? Language Learning Journal 18: 68-76.
  • Mochizuki, M. 2012. Four empirical vocabulary tests studies in the three dimensional framework. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction 1/1: 44-52. [Available at http://www.vli-journal.org/issues/01.1/issue01.1.08.pdf]
  • Moreno Espinosa, S. 2009. Young learners’ L2 word association responses in two different learning contexts. In R. M. Jiménez Catalán and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning in Europe. 241-256. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Moreno Espinosa, S. 2010. Evaluación del vocabulario en redacciones escritas por aprendices de inglés como L2 a través de la tecnología. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Universidad de La Rioja.
  • Nation, P. 1990. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Newbury.
  • Nation, P. 1993. Using dictionaries to estimate vocabulary size: Essential, but rarely followed, procedures. Language Testing 10: 27-40.
  • Nation, P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. New York: Cambridge
  • Nation, P. 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes 63: 59-81.
  • Nation, P. and R. Waring. 1997. Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy, (eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. 6-19. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nyikos, M. 1990. Sex-related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. Modern Language Journal 74: 273-287.
  • Scarcella, R. and C. Zimmerman. 1998. Academic words and gender. ESL student performance on a test of academic lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 27-49.
  • Schmitt, N. 2000. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. and C. Clapham. 2001. Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing 18: 55-88.
  • [Available at http://www.norbertschmitt.co.uk/uploads/schmitt-n-schmitt-d-andclapham-c-(2001)-developing-and-exploring-the-behaviour-of-two-new-versions-ofthe-vocabulary-levels-test-language-testing-18-1-55-88.pdf]
  • Sunderland, J. 2010. Theorizing gender perspectives in foreign and second language learning.
  • In R. M. Jiménez Catalán (ed.), Gender Perspectives on Vocabulary in Foreign and Second Languages. 1-22. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Takala, S. 1984. Evaluation of students’ knowledge of English vocabulary in the Finnish comprehensive school. Reports of the Institute of Educational Research 350. Jyväskylä: Finland.
  • Takala, S. 1985. Estimating students’ vocabulary sizes in foreign language teaching. Practice and problems in language testing. In. V. Kohonen, H. van Essen and C. Klein-Braley (eds.), Practice and Problems in Language Testing. 157-65. Tampere: Finnish Association for Applied Linguistics.
  • Terrazas Gallego, M. and M. P. Agustín Llach. 2009. Exploring the increase of receptive vocabulary knowledge in the foreign language: A longitudinal study. International
  • Journal of English Studies 9/1: 113-133. [Available at http://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/viewFile/90681/87481]
  • Thorndike, E. and I. Lorge. 1944. The Teacher’s Word Book of 30,000 Words. New York Teachers College: Columbia University.
  • Webb, S. 2005. Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27 (1): 33-52.
  • Webb, S. 2008. Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second language acquisition 30 (1): 79-95.
  • Webb, S. A. and A. C-S. Chang. 2012. Second language vocabulary growth. RELC Journal 43/1: 113-126.
  • Webb, S. and M. P. H. Rodgers. 2009a. The vocabulary demands of television programmes. Language Learning 59 (2): 335-366.
  • Webb, S. and M. P .H. Rodgers. 2009b. The lexical coverage of movies. Applied Linguistics 30/3: 407-427.
  • Yamamoto, Y. 2011. Bridging the gap between receptive and productive vocabulary size through extensive reading. The Reading Matrix 11/3: 226-242.
  • Zhong, H. 2012. ‘Multidimensional vocabulary knowledge: Development from receptive to productive use’. In D. Hirsh (ed.), Current Perspectives in Second Language Vocabulary Research. 23-55. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • West, M. 1953. A General Service List of English Words. London: Longman. http://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/viewFile/90681/87481