Revisiting Goldberg's semantic constraints on the "way" construction

  1. Luzondo Oyón, Alba
Revista:
Revista española de lingüística aplicada

ISSN: 0213-2028

Ano de publicación: 2013

Volume: 26

Páxinas: 349-364

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Revista española de lingüística aplicada

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso aberto Editor

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Boas, H. C. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • Boas, H. C. 2005. “Determining the productivity of resultative constructions: A reply to Goldberg & Jackendoff”.  Language 81(2): 448-464.
  • Boas, H. C. 2008a. “Resolving form-meaning discrepancies in Construction Grammar”. Constructional Reorganization. Ed. J. Leino. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 11-36.
  • Boas, H. C. 2008b. “Determining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 113-144.
  • Boas, H. C. 2009. “Verb meanings at the crossroads between higher-level and lowerlevel constructions”. Lingua 120: 22-34.
  • Boas, H. C. 2011. “Coercion and leaking argument structures in Construction Grammar”. Linguistics 49(6): 1271-1303.
  • Boas, H. C. 2013. “Cognitive Construction Grammar.” The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Eds. T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 233-254.
  • Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Croft, W. 2003. “Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy”. Motivation in Language. Studies in Honour of Günter Radden. Eds. H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven and K. Panther. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 49-68.
  • Dirven, R. 1999. “Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata”. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Eds. K. Panther y G. Radden. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 275-287.
  • Fried, M. and J.-O. Östman. 2004. “Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch”. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective. Eds. M. Fried and J.-O. Östman. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 11-86.
  • Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldberg, A. 1996.  “Making one’s way through the data”.  Complex Predicates. Eds. A. Alsina, J. Bresnan and P. Sells. Stanford: CSLI Publications.  29-53. Also in Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning. Eds. M. Shibatani and S. Thompson. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 29-53.
  • Goldberg, A. 2003. “Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5): 219-224.
  • Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldberg, A. E. and R. Jackendoff. 2004. “The English resultative as a family of constructions”. Language 80: 532-568.
  • Goldberg, A. and L. Suttle 2010. “Construction Grammar”. Interdisciplinary Reviews; Cognitive Science 1: 1-10.
  • Gonzálvez-García, F. 2011. “La(s) Gramática(s) de Construcciones”. Lingüística Cognitiva. Eds. I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano and J. Valenzuela Manzanares. Barcelona: Anthropos.
  • Gonzálvez-García, F. and C. S. Butler 2006. “Mapping functional-cognitive space”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4: 39-95.
  • Grady, J. 1997. “THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited”. Cognitive Linguistics 8 (4): 267-290.
  • Iwata, S. 2005. “The role of verb meaning in locative alternations. Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots. Eds. M. Fried and H. C. Boas. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 101-118.
  • Iwata, S. 2006a. “Argument resultatives and adjunct resultatives in a lexical constructional account: The case of resultatives with adjectival result phrases”. Language Sciences 28: 449-496.
  • Iwata, S. 2006b. “Where do constructions come from?”. English Linguistics 23: 493-533.
  • Iwata, S. 2008. The Locative Alternation: A Lexical-Constructional Approach. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT-Press.
  • Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kuno, S. and K. Takami. 2004. Functional Constraints in Grammar: On the UnergativeUnaccusative Distinction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Langacker, R. W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Levin, B. and T. R. Rapoport. 1988. “Lexical subordination”. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 275-289.
  • Östman, J.-O. and M. Fried. 2004. “Historical and intellectual background of Construction grammar”. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective. Eds. M. Fried and J.-O. Östman. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-10.
  • Ruiz De Mendoza, F. J. and R. Mairal. 2007. “High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction”. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Lexicon and Grammar. Eds. G. Radden, K. M. Köpcke, Th. Berg and P. Siemund. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 33-49.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and R. Mairal. 2011. “Constraints on syntactic alternation: lexical-constructional subsumption in the Lexical-Constructional Model”. Morphosyntactic Alternations in English: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. Ed. P. Guerrero. London, UK/Oakville, CT: Equinox. 62-82.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and L. Pérez. 2001. “Metonymy and the grammar: Motivation, constraints, and interaction”. Language and Communication 21: 321-357.