A constructionist approach to illocutionthe cae of orders

  1. Campo Martínez, Nuria del
  2. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
Revista:
Miscelánea: A journal of english and american studies

ISSN: 1137-6368

Año de publicación: 2012

Número: 45

Páginas: 13-29

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Miscelánea: A journal of english and american studies

Repositorio institucional: lock_openAcceso abierto Editor

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Bach, K. & R. M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Baicchi, A. & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2010. “The cognitive grounding of illocutionary constructions within the theoretical perspective of the Lexical-Constructional Model”. Textus. English Studies in Italy, 23/3: 543-563.
  • Dik S. C. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar. The structure of the clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • —. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Complex and derived constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. & C. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
  • Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics.London: Longman.
  • Mairal Usón, R. & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2009. “Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction”. In Butler, C. S. & J. Martin Arista (eds.) Deconstructing constructions. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 153–198.
  • Morgan, J. 1978. “Two types of convention in indirect speech acts”. In Cole, P. (ed.) Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press: 261–280.
  • Panther, K.-U. & L. Thornburg. 1998. “A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 755–769.
  • —. 1999. “The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian”. In Panther, K.-U and G. Radden (eds.) Metoynymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 333–357.
  • Pérez Hernández, L. 2001. Illocution and Cognition: A Constructional Approach. Logroño: University of La Rioja, University Press.
  • Pérez Hernández, L. & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2002. “Grounding, Semantic Motivation, and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Directive Speech Acts”. Journal of Pragmatics 34/3: 259–284.
  • —. 2010. “A Lexical Constructional Model Account of Illocution”. VIAL 8: 99–139.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. 2005. “Constructing meaning through conceptual mappings”. In Fuertes, F. (ed.) Aportaciones recientes en Lingüística Cognitiva, Lingüística del Corpus, Lenguajes de Especialidad y Lenguas en Contacto. Universidad de Valladolid: 19–38.
  • —. 2007. “High-level cognitive models: in search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behavior”. In Kosecki, K. (ed.) Perspectives on Metonymy. Frankfurt, Main: Peter Lang : 11–30.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. & A. BAICCHI. 2007. “Illocutionary constructions: Cognitive motivation and linguistic realization”. In Istvan, K. & L. Horn (eds.) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 95–128.
  • Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & R. Mairal Usón. 2008. “Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: an introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model”. Folia Linguistica 42/2: 355–400.
  • Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • —. 1975. “Indirect Speech Acts”. In Cole, P. & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3.New York: Academic Press: 59–82.
  • Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Stefanowistch, A. & S. T. Gries. 2003. “Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8/2: 209–243.