Hardiness as moderator of the relationship between structural and psychological empowerment on burnout in middle managers

  1. Ayala Calvo, J.-C. 1
  2. García, G.M. 1
  1. 1 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

Revista:
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

ISSN: 0963-1798

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 91

Número: 2

Páginas: 362-384

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1111/JOOP.12194 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85046337625 GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Resumen

Using a sample of 210 middle managers, a time-lagged design with four data-collection points was used to test whether hardiness moderates the relationship between structural empowerment (SE), psychological empowerment (PE), and burnout. The structural equation model analysed revealed an indirect effect of SE on burnout through PE. This indirect effect is moderated by hardiness. The results also show that this indirect effect is only significant when the subject shows medium or high levels of hardiness. Our findings suggest that work environment conditions are not enough to explain the levels of burnout. Practitioner points: The propensity to experience burnout is linked to structural empowerment (SE). Therefore, employers should promote changes in the structural conditions of the working environment. Hardiness modifies the influence of SE on psychological empowerment (PE). Hardiness helps taking better advantage of the conditions of SE. Therefore, employers should promote training programmes on hardiness. Psychological empowerment mediates the relationship between SE and burnout. A moderate or high level of hardiness is needed for SE to raise PE and to diminish burnout symptoms. In the case of low hardiness middle managers, organizations must develop hardiness before enhancing SE. © 2017 The British Psychological Society